- family
- convergence
- severity
- systemic
- triggerError
- A verifier or critic agent's correction of a false claim arrives after a delay, while the claim itself is already propagating through the agent network via normal message exchange.
- mechanism
- The system is modeled as delayed consensus on a graph with grounded corrector nodes; spectral decomposition of the grounded Laplacian yields a closed-form stability threshold for the verification 'dose'. When correction is too strong or arrives too late relative to how fast the claim spreads, the system does not settle into either the correct or the false belief: it flips into sustained oscillation between belief states. The worst-case regime is when communication delay and verification delay coincide, where the derived threshold is the inverse golden ratio.
- blastRadius
- The whole agent network subject to the delayed-correction regime oscillates rather than converging on a stable answer, so any downstream consumer sampling the system at different times sees contradictory outputs; the effect was confirmed experimentally across five open models. Grounded factual-answering tasks are immune (truth acts as an absorbing boundary), so the exposure is specific to signed-belief and opinion-style consensus tasks.
- detection
- Track variance/oscillation in an agent's or the group's belief state across successive rounds rather than only its final answer; check whether the observed communication delay and verification delay coincide, the paper's highest-risk regime; compare the measured dose-delay pair against the derived closed-form stability threshold.
- mitigation
- Use the paper's supermodular placement objective with a greedy (1-1/e)-approximation to assign a limited number of verifiers to nodes that maximise convergence speed; cap correction dose below the instability threshold for the given delay; separate communication and verification channels so their delays do not coincide.